SOAX has thoughtful rotation controls, but their pricing model — counting ports, sub-users, and bandwidth separately — gets confusing fast. Rainproxy keeps the flexibility and bills you for one thing: gigabytes used.
Flexible rotation — without the per-port pricing maze.
Run out of ports mid-scrape and your job dies. Our model has no port limit.
Their site has 6 plan dimensions. Ours has one slider: how much bandwidth?
SOAX bandwidth resets monthly. Ours rolls indefinitely.
Their LATAM and SEA coverage is thin. Ours has full coverage across 195+ countries.
Real, public numbers — no asterisks, no "starting from".
| Feature | SOAX | Rainproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Ports × bandwidth × users | Bandwidth only |
| Bandwidth rollover | Expires monthly | Never expires |
| Concurrent threads | Port-limited | Unlimited |
| Geo coverage | 150+ countries | 195+ countries, 700+ cities |
| Mobile carriers | Limited | Major carriers in 60+ countries |
| Free trial | $1.99 for 100 MB | 250 MB free with Google sign-up |
Most teams migrate in an afternoon. Our chat will review your code while you do it.
On Rainproxy there are no ports to count. Open as many connections as your code needs.
Per-request, per-session, time-based — all supported with the same parameter names.
Bulk import via API, traffic caps and permissions preserved.
Yes — per-request, sticky-by-time, sticky-by-session, and custom rules are all supported.
Most SOAX customers switching to Rainproxy reduce monthly spend 30–50% just by eliminating port overhead.
Our Web Unblocker covers the same targets at a comparable per-request price, with the same JSON shape.
Run the same scraper through both networks. If we don't win on success rate and price, you owe us nothing.
Zip-level targeting, live IP quality scoring and per-request speed filtering — try each one as an interactive demo before you spend a cent.